Abstract
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2020
Patel Prittesh.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Materials And Methods
Effect of pH on mycelial growth was studied by growing To scrutinize the effect of different carbon and inorganic nitrogen sources on growth and cultural characteristics of fungal pathogen Czapek Dox agar (CDA) media were used. All the ingredients with required quantity needed to prepare final amount were weighed and added. Nitrogen sources were added in equal amount to all the individual media. Czapek media without nitrogen source were served as control. Various nitrogen sources such as Potassium Nitrate, Sodium Nitrate, Ammonium Metavanadate, Calcium Nitrate, Cobalt Nitrate, Ammonium Fluoride, Ammonium Chloride, Ammonium Nitrate, Ammonium Oxalate, and Ammonium Sulphate were used at 0.2% concentration. Various carbon sources were weighed and added to the basal medium. A 20 mL of sterilized medium was poured into sterilized Petri plates (90 mm diameter). Inoculations were made with cultural discs (5mm) from seven days old active culture of The experiment was carried out following RCB with three replicates of each treatment. All experimental data of C and N source were subjected to statistical analysis by standard deviation. In case of pH analysis the significance of differences between the treatments was evaluated by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of 95 %.
Results
A total of seven different pH values were evaluated for studying the growth of It is well known that supplementation of different nitrogen sources in media affect the micro-organism growth. In present study, ten different nitrogenous sources were tested on CDA medium to know their effect on the mycelial growth rate and characteristics of the fungus. All the nitrogen sources had support good mycelial growth at 1.5gm/L concentration except Ammonium Metavanadate and cobalt nitrate. By measuring the radial mycelial growth on CDA, ammonium chloride (7.96±0.11 cm) was found to be most efficient for growth promotion followed by ammonium nitrate (7.7±0.1 cm) and ammonium sulphate (7.3±0.1 cm). Carbon is one of the most important nutrients required by living organisms for its growth. In present study, total nine different carbon sources were tested on CDA medium to observe their effect on the mycelial growth rate and characteristics of the fungus. All the nine kinds of carbon sources tested were found suitable for fungus growth. The efficiency of individual carbon sources could be divided into three categories. The first category which recorded to promote best radial mycelial growth included was starch (7.96±0.05 cm) and sucrose (7.93±0.05 cm). The capability of the fungus to utilized sucrose and starch was due to the possession of relevant enzymes to hydrolyze them into their component sugars
Potassium Nitrate
3.0±0.1
5.03±0.05
6.5±0.1
White, Uneven, Thin, Sparse growth
Sodium Nitrate
2.93±0.15
4.7±0.1
6.26±0.11
Dull White, Uneven, Thin, Sparse growth
Ammonium Metavanadate
0.13±0.05
0.23±0.05
0.36±0.05
Dark Grey, Dense growth at centre
Calcium Nitrate
2.26±0.25
4.2±0.1
5.93±0.15
White, Uneven, Thin, Scanty growth
Cobalt Nitrate
0
0
0
-
Ammonium Fluoride
0.16±0.05
0.33±0.05
0.5±0.1
Dark Grey, Dense growth at centre
Ammonium Chloride
3.3±0.2
5.6±0.1
7.96±0.11
Dull White, Even, Thin, fluffy growth
Ammonium Nitrate
3.03±0.05
5.4±0.1
7.7±0.1
White, Uneven, fluffy growth
Ammonium Oxalate
1.26±0.15
2.63±0.15
3.7±0.1
Light Grey, Even, Scanty growth
Ammonium Sulphate
2.96±0.20
5.56±0.15
7.3±0.1
White, Uneven, Dense growth at centre
Mannitol
3.13±0.05
5.76±0.20
7.23±0.11
White, Uneven, Scanty growth
Starch
3.3±0.1
6.33±0.05
7.96±0.05
Dull white, Uneven, Thick fluffy growth
Cellulose
2.13±0.05
3.03±0.15
4.83±0.05
Light white, Even, Dense mycelia at centre
Sucrose
3.86±0.05
6.53±0.35
7.93±0.05
Dull white, Even, Thin growth
Maltose
3.73±0.05
6.83±0.05
7.7±0.2
Light grey, Uneven, Sparse growth
Dextrose
3.8±0.1
6.33±0.11
7.5±0.2
White, Even, Scanty growth
Fructose
3.03±0.05
5.13±0.05
6.96±0.11
White, Uneven, Thick fluffy at centre
Lactose
3.46±0.05
6.26±0.25
7.7±0.1
Dull white, Even, Fluffy growth
Xylose
3.03±0.05
5.53±0.05
6.9±0.2
White, Uneven, Thin growth
Conclusion
This study is essential to recognize the physiology and metabolite preference of