Abstract
Prevalence of coronary artery disease is between 7-13 percent in urban and 2-7 % in rural India
This study was conducted in the department of cardiology, NIMS hospital Hyderabad which receives patients from the urban as well as rural areas of Telangana. the patients admitted in the department of cardiology, NIMS hospital Hyderabad that presented with acute coronary syndromes and diagnosed to have coronary artery disease (single vessel/multivessel disease) on coronary angiography taken for study. Sample Size is 150
Among the 150 subjects, males were 111(74%) and females were 39(26%). Mean age of the study population is 55.2 ± 11.4. Among SVD group 73.65% were males &26.3% were females. Among MVD group 76.2% were males & 23.7% were females. Mean age for SVD was 53±14.4 years, while mean age foe MVD was 58.6±14.5 years. For ACS mean age of presentation for females is 60.7±11.4 and for males mean age of presentation is 55.1±12.6. MVD (57.2%) were more common among smokers than SVD. In <45 years age group SVD (69.2%) were more common than MVD (30.8%). In 45- 70 years age group and >70 years age group MVD were more common than SVD with 69.6% and 66.6% respectively, which is statistically significant. MVD (60%) were more common among hypertensives than SVD. Among non-hypertensives MVD (41.8%) was less common than SVD (58.2%) MVD was common among all age groups, which is statistically signicant. Among STEMI group SVD (58.3%) was more common than MVD (41.7%). Among NSTEMI group MVD (62%) was more common than SVD (38%).Correlation between groups was statistically significant. Among SVD study group, LVEF was commonly between 30-45% & very few with LVEF <30% MVD was associated with more severe LV dysfunction as compared to SVD in acute MI. The difference in ejection fraction between the two groups was statistically significant P value=0.0002. In hospital MACE Among SVD there was 1 MI (due to stent thrombosis) who had to TVR (primary PCI) & rest were asymptomatic and discharged in normal state MVD there were in hospital deaths (due to refractory cardiogenic shock) rest were asymptomatic and were discharged in normal state. This difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant.
Multivessel disease in ACS were seen more commonly among elderly as compared to young subjects where single vessel disease were more common. Females especially elderly more commonly have multivessel disease. Mean age for multivessel disease was higher than single vessel disease. Among <45 years age group, SVD was more prevalent among smokers, obese and physically active. Multi vessel disease is more prevalent among patients with risk factors like diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and physically inactive. Subjects with family history of premature CAD presented early and correlated well with prevalence of SVD.NSTEMI presented more with multi vessel disease. In echocardiographic wall motion analysis, a depressed regional segment of infarcted area with remote hyperkinesis predicted SVD where as remote area hypokinesis predicts more multivessel disease. In hospital outcomes were seen among multi vessel disease as compared to single vessel disease although not statistically significant.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2022
Kumari Nuthalapat Rama, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Prevalence of coronary artery disease is between 7-13 percent in urban and 2-7 % in rural India
Materials And Methods
This study was conducted in the department of cardiology, NIMS hospital Hyderabad which receives patients from the urban as well as rural areas of Telangana Study Population: the patients admitted in the department of cardiology, NIMS hospital Hyderabad who presented with acute coronary syndromes and diagnosed to have coronary artery disease (single vessel/multivessel disease) on coronary angiography taken for study. We compared the age, sex, ECG, ECHO profiles in both patients with SVD and MVD. Sample Size: 150 Study Period: MAY 2019 -DECEMBER 2020 Study method: a prospective, observational and longitudinal study Consenting patients All patients of any age or either sex admitted with acute coronary syndromes Patients diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction found to have CAD either single or multi vessel disease on coronary angiography between MAY 2019-DECEMBER 2020. Previously diagnosed acute coronary syndromes patients Previous PCI or CABG Patients with valvular heart disease Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Patients with pericardial disease Patients with myocarditis Patients on cardiovascular devices
Results
Among the 150 subjects, males were 111(74%) and females were 39(26%). Mean age of the study population is 55.2 ± 11.4. Among SVD group 73.65% were males &26.3% were females. Among MVD group 76.2% were males & 23.7% were females. Mean age for SVD was 53±14.4 years, while mean age foe MVD was 58.6±14.5 years. For ACS mean age of presentation for females is 60.7±11.4 and for males mean age of presentation is 55.1±12.6. MVD (57.2%) were more common among smokers than SVD. In <45 years age group SVD (69.2%) were more common than MVD (30.8%). In 45- 70 years age group and >70 years age group MVD were more common than SVD with 69.6% and 66.6% respectively, which is statistically significant. MVD (60%) were more common among hypertensives than SVD. Among non-hypertensives MVD (41.8%) was less common than SVD (58.2%) MVD was common among all age groups, which is statistically significant. Among diabetes subjects MVD (62.7%) was more common than SVD (37.2). In <45 years age group no difference was seen between SVD or MVD. Among >45 years age group MVD was seen more commonly than SVD. The difference between two groups is statistically significant. Among normal BMI group SVD (66.7%) were more common than MVD (33.3%). Among over weight group, MVD (65.7) were more common than SVD (34.2%).Among obese group, MVD (66.6%) were more common than SVD (33.3%).Association was statistically significant between two groups. Among subjects with positive family h/o premature CAD, SVD (66.6%) was more common than MVD (33.4%).Among subjects with negative family h/o premature CAD, MVD (54.1%) was relatively more than SVD (45.9%)Therefore, patients with family history of premature CAD tend to present early & have more SVD. Among STEMI group SVD (58.3%) was more common than MVD (41.7%).Among NSTEMI group MVD (62%) was more common than SVD (38%).Correlation between groups was statistically significant. Among SVD study group, LVEF was commonly between 30-45% & very few with LVEF <30% MVD was associated with more severe LV dysfunction as compared to SVD in acute MI. ( In hospital MACE Among SVD there was 1 MI (due to stent thrombosis) who had to TVR (primary PCI) & rest were asymptomatic and discharged in normal state MVD there were in hospital deaths (due to refractory cardiogenic shock) rest were asymptomatic and were discharged in normal state. This difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant, as shown in (
Variables
Death
MI
Stroke
Angina
TVR
Asymptomatic
Mace in Hospital
SVD
0
1.60%
0
0
1.60%
98.30%
MVD
3.20%
0
0
0
0
96.70%
Discussion
Series of subjects presenting to cardiology ICCU at NIMS hospital between May 2019 to December 2020 who were diagnosed to have ACS were subjected to coronary angiography, on basis of which was categorised in to single and multivessel disease. Various clinical parameters, ECG changes, Echo features and outcome parameters were noted and compared among single and multivessel disease with acute coronary syndromes. In study by Sharma R et al, The multi vessel disease was associated with risk factors like diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and physically inactivity and patients with a family history of premature coronary artery disease presented with SVD. The patients with MVD may be linked to the inactivation of critical anti-aging genes such as Sirtuin 1. Sirtuin 1 has been shown to be defective in diabetes, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia and exercise has been shown to activate Sirtuin 1. In developing countries chronic diseases has been shown to be linked to the inactivation of Sirtuin 1 with relevance to ACS. In the present study, we found that MVD and stent implantation were relatively more associated with only one death. Studies by Chow et al. and De Waha et al both reported that the severity of CAD not only predicted all cause mortality but also were high risk factors for adverse clinical outcomes. The higher morbidity and mortality are seen in ST segment elevation MI patients with multivessel CAD.
Conclusion
Multivessel disease in ACS were seen more commonly among elderly as compared to young subjects where single vessel disease were more common. Females especially elderly more commonly have multivessel disease. Mean age for multivessel disease was higher than single vessel disease. Among <45 years age group, SVD was more prevalent among smokers, obese and physically active. Multi vessel disease is more prevalent among patients with risk factors like diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and physically inactive. Subjects with family history of premature CAD presented early and correlated well with prevalence of SVD.NSTEMI presented more with multi vessel disease. In echocardiographic wall motion analysis, a depressed regional segment of infarcted area with remote hyperkinesis predicted SVD where as remote area hypokinesis predicts more multivessel disease. In hospital outcomes were seen among multi vessel disease as compared to single vessel disease although not statistically significant.