Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers support the quality and integrity of Journal of Aging Research And Healthcare by providing objective, constructive evaluations.
- Relevance to aging research and healthcare practice
- Originality and scientific contribution
- Methodological rigor and transparent reporting
- Ethics approval and consent statements where applicable
- Clarity of results, tables, and figures
Check whether the manuscript includes a Data Availability Statement and follows appropriate reporting checklists (EQUATOR Network). Note any missing elements that affect reproducibility or interpretation.
Flag concerns about plagiarism, image manipulation, or inconsistent data reporting. Confirm that vulnerable populations, including older adults with cognitive impairment, are protected through appropriate consent and ethical oversight.
- Summarize the manuscript contribution in 1 to 2 sentences
- List major issues that must be addressed
- Provide minor comments and formatting notes
Manuscripts are confidential documents. Do not share content outside the review process or use unpublished information for personal research. Disclose any conflicts of interest and decline reviews when conflicts exist.
Provide specific, respectful comments that help authors improve clarity and scientific quality. Use a professional tone and focus on evidence. Recommend revisions when appropriate and highlight major concerns clearly for the editor.
