JI offers language editing support to help authors communicate immunization findings with clarity and precision. The service improves grammar, flow, and technical consistency without altering scientific meaning.

Clear language is essential when manuscripts are used by public health teams, policymakers, and clinical partners. Editing support helps ensure evidence is easy to interpret and ready for review.

• Manuscripts written by non native English speakers
• Complex clinical or epidemiologic studies
• Guideline or policy analyses
• Multicenter studies requiring consistent terminology
• Resubmissions that need clarity improvements

Editing support includes harmonizing vaccine names, dosing schedules, and outcome terminology. Consistency improves readability for multidisciplinary audiences and supports accurate interpretation.

If your manuscript uses local program terminology or surveillance terms, provide a brief glossary to guide the editor.

• Manuscript file with figures and tables
• Target journal section and article type
• Preferred terminology for vaccines and endpoints
• Any reviewer comments to address

Email the editorial office at [email protected] with your manuscript and preferred timeline. The team will confirm turnaround expectations and share any preparation steps.

For urgent revisions, indicate the target submission date so the team can prioritize scheduling.

Include any specific terminology preferences to ensure consistency.

Language editing does not replace peer review or methodological review. Authors remain responsible for data accuracy, ethics compliance, and scientific validity.

Editing focuses on language clarity, consistency, and formatting alignment. If substantive methodological revisions are required, the editor will flag those areas for author review.

Language editors align terminology with immunization standards and ensure consistent use of vaccine names, dose intervals, and outcome descriptors. This alignment supports smoother peer review and production workflows.

Consistent language improves reader comprehension across regions.

Style alignment also supports indexing clarity.

Terminology consistency aids cross study comparisons.

Clear writing helps reviewers focus on methodology and results rather than wording. Well structured language reduces revision cycles and speeds editorial decisions.

Consistent terminology also aids indexing and metadata quality.

Editing can improve the clarity of program implications.

It reduces ambiguity for reviewers.

Language editing does not guarantee acceptance and does not replace methodological rigor. Authors remain responsible for the scientific content and accuracy of all data.

If extensive restructuring is needed, the editorial office will recommend additional revision steps.

Editing does not substitute for ethical compliance checks.

Authors retain full responsibility for conclusions.

JI is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in immunization research and program evaluation. We emphasize reproducible methods, clear reporting of vaccine outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in vaccine science, safety monitoring, and public health impact.