Journal of Otolaryngology Advances · Current Issue
Current Issue of the Journal of Otolaryngology Advances
The journal publishes in numbered volumes and issues. Volume 2, Issue 4 is the current issue, and it carries the journal’s publication notices; the most recent issue containing research is Volume 2, Issue 3. Every record below is stated with its type, its authors, its pages, its date and its identifier.
Volume 2, Issue 4 2 records ISSN 2379-8572 Crossref DOI prefix 10.14302
The current issue
The Journal of Otolaryngology Advances publishes in numbered volumes and issues. Each record is assigned to one issue, paginated continuously within it, and deposited with that volume and issue in its metadata, so an article can be cited by volume, issue and page in the ordinary way.
- Current issue
- Volume 2, Issue 4
- Records in this issue
- 2 — the journal’s publication notices, listed below with the article each one concerns
- Most recent research issue
- Volume 2, Issue 3, 4 articles, published between 5 May 2025 and 22 September 2025.
- Issues published
- 8, listed in the archive with every article they contain.
- Identifiers
- Registered articles carry a Crossref DOI under the prefix 10.14302. A record is shown with its DOI only where that DOI is registered and resolves; otherwise it is shown with its page on the journal.
- Access
- Every article is open access from the day it appears, published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license with copyright retained by the authors.
In this issue
Volume 2, Issue 4
2 records, in issue order
Publication notice
Issued by the Editor-in-Chief on behalf of the Journal of Otolaryngology Advances.
Retracts
Publication notice
Issued by the Editor-in-Chief on behalf of the Journal of Otolaryngology Advances.
Most recent research
These are the articles of Volume 2, Issue 3, the most recent issue of the journal that contains research. They are listed in the order the issue paginates them.
Volume 2, Issue 3
4 articles, in issue order
Berdia Beridze, George Gogniashvili
https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-25-5645
Abstract
Purpose
The objective of this prospective case-control study was to perform translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) into the Georgian language.
Methods
The translation and validation of the SNOT -22 questionnaire was performed using the forward-backward translation technique. After proper translation, the translated questionnaire was completed by chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients before and after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and by healthy individuals as controls.
Results
SNOT22 was translated into the Georgian language; the pilot study involved 34 patients, the test–retest group consisted of 30 patients with CRS and the control group of 71 patients without CRS complaints; 34 patients were evaluated before surgery and 3 months after surgery. The results showed a good internal correlation with Cronbach’s alpha - 0.88 at the initial examination, and 0.93 at the retest examination; both values suggest good internal consistency within SNOT-22. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.72 (p<0.001), revealing a good correlation between initial scores and retest scores. Our sample of healthy individuals had a median score of 10,11 points and the instrument was able to differentiate between the healthy and the patient group, demonstrating its validity (p<0.0001).
Conclusions
The Georgian version of the SNOT-22 questionnaire is a valid outcome measure for patients with CRS.
The Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential: A Reinterpretation of its Electrogenesis
Nigel A Shaw
https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2379-8572.joa-25-5687
Abstract
Depending upon the species, the brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) consists of four or five major high frequency components. According to longstanding doctrine, each wave represents the sequential activation of successively higher nuclei and tracts from the 8th (auditory) nerve to the midbrain (inferior colliculus). Although this conceptual framework has acquired the status of near dogma, surprisingly little evidence exists in support. In the present analysis, a new interpretation of the electrogenesis of the BAEP is proposed which is simpler although it retains skeletal elements of the older explanation. The revised model is mostly derived from two distinct sources. In the first, the timing of the BAEP waves is compared with that of cortical activity for a range of mammals including humans, monkeys, cats, rats and guinea pigs. It is demonstrated that for each of these, the conduction time of the acoustic signal to the cortex from the putative midbrain component (wave IV or V) is so unrealistically long that it implies that the entire waveform must arise in the peripheral pathways of the auditory system. In the second, a retrospective analysis is made of click repetition rates on the BAEP using extradural electrodes. It was shown that at high rates of stimulation (about 100/sec), the behavior of the waveform is almost totally at variance with the expectations of the conventional model. The essence of the revised conception is that all BAEP waves are just variations of the compound action potential of the 8th nerve, albeit generated or regenerated via separate routes and different methods. Such an explanation would thereby account for their near uniform sharp morphology as well as creating the impression of a composite neuronal response. More specifically, in the case of a four component BAEP, wave I is assumed to be generated by the normal air conduction route in an identical manner to the conventional explanation. In contrast, wave ll is assumed to be generated via bone conduction in the temporal skull thereby bypassing the transduction process in the middle ear. Wave lll is assumed to be generated by the first echo of the bone-conducted sound wave. Likewise, the second rebound within the temporal bone serves as the stimulation to evoke wave lV. As the energy of the auditory stimulus gradually dissipates, it may still continue to generate a train of lower amplitude potentials. It is concluded that the BAEP may contain little or no brainstem or midbrain activity and therefore the term BAEP may be a misnomer. A more appropriate epithet might therefore be the auditory nerve evoked potential or ANEP.
A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Cartilage - Perichondrium Graft in Tympanoplasty
Shaden Zakariya Yahya Al Riyami, Ammar Al Lawati, Subirendra Kumar
Abstract
Objective
The repair of the tympanic membrane has been attempted with large variety of synthetic, homologous and autologous tissue; however, temporalis fascia and cartilage-perichondrium are used most commonly today.
Study Design
This is a prospective study of patients confirmed to have CSOM and operated during the years of 2012-2013 at Al Nahdha Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. The patients were followed up postoperatively at which we compared the graft success rate and level of hearing improvement.
Setting
ENT clinic at Al Nahda hospital
Subjects
Patients who presented to the ENT clinic at Al Nahda hospital, operated in the period between 2012 and 2013, diagnosed as CSOM and meeting our inclusion criteria.
Methods
We compared the outcome of the repair of the tympanic membrane perforation using temporalis fascia graft versus cartilage perichondrium grafts.
Results
100% of the cartilage-perichondrium group showed a successful graft uptake in comparison to 98.9% in the temporalis fascia. Our data did not show significant differences in the average air bone gap change in both groups.
Conclusion
Both cartilage-perichondrium and temporalis fascia provide viable autograft material. Both achieve comparable and excellent graft uptake. Completion of our study is needed to study the hearing restoration in both groups.
Radio-Induced Maxillary Angiosarcoma: About a Case
Mohamed Hachemi, Fatma Zohra Touarigt, Lina Hireche, Lylia Oukaour
Abstract
Introduction
Angiosarcoma is a rare malignant tumour from fast-evolving and aggressive vascular endothelial cells that accounts for 1% of all sarcomas. The sinus location of angiosarcoma is exceptional. The clinical polymorphism of this tumour may cause a delay in diagnosis. Risk factors are not always understood. However, a history of radiation therapy for locoregional cancer and/or lymphedema is most commonly found. The prognosis remains bleak with an overall five-year survival of 35 to 40%.
Objectives
The authors discuss the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic modalities and difficulties of this tumour. Observation: The authors report a case of maxillary sinus angiosarcoma confirmed by radio-induced secondary CD34 immunohistological staining in a 40-year-old man having a history of hemangioendothelioma treated with conservative endoscopic surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy 15 months earlier.
Discussion
This lesion is rare in the ENT sphere and may be confused with a benign tumor in its early stages. Only histological examination with immunohistochemistry can confirm the diagnosis (factor VIII, CD34 and CD31 antigens). Treatment consists of a wide resection followed by radiotherapy, hence the need for early diagnosis in the metastatic phase, first-line treatments include doxorubicin or paclitaxel weekly.
Conclusion
Radio-induced angiosarcoma is a rare malignant tumour, it occurs in patients who have received conservative treatment and radiation therapy for nasosinusitis cancers. Angiosarcomas of the nasal passages remain a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to their local and general aggressiveness.
Where to read further
-
Archive
Every issue the journal has published, with its articles and identifiers.
-
Aims and Scope
What the journal publishes, and the boundary a manuscript has to sit inside.
-
Editorial board
The editors who assess submissions and take the decisions on them.
-
Editorial policies
Ethics, integrity, corrections and retractions in full.
-
About the journal
What the journal is, who it serves, and the principles it publishes under.
-
Instructions for authors
How a manuscript must be prepared and reported before it reaches an editor.
The published record
Corrections and retractions are published as citable records in their own right and are listed here with the article each one concerns, so the record of what the journal has published stays complete.
Journal of Otolaryngology Advances (JOA)
ISSN 2379-8572 · Crossref DOI prefix 10.14302 · Published by Open Access Pub ·
Articles are published under CC BY 4.0 with copyright retained by the authors.