Editors Guidelines
Guidance for editors to support rigorous peer review and high impact molecular research.
Editor Responsibilities
- Uphold scope fit and scientific rigor
- Select qualified reviewers
- Ensure ethical compliance
- Provide clear, timely decisions
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2326-0793
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2326-0793
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Proteome profiling, genomic discovery, multi-omics integration, biomarker validation, computational proteomics, and translational molecular medicine. We emphasize reproducible pipelines and clinically meaningful evidence.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid online publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
Role of JPGR Editors
Editors guide the scientific direction of JPGR by ensuring manuscripts meet scope, quality, and ethical standards. The role includes coordinating peer review, evaluating reviewer feedback, and issuing decisions grounded in scientific merit.
Editors also help maintain consistency in decision making across proteomics, genomics, and systems biology submissions.
Decision Criteria
- Novelty and relevance to proteomics or genomics
- Methodological rigor and reproducibility
- Data availability and transparency
- Clarity of results and interpretation
- Ethical compliance and disclosure completeness
Managing Peer Review
Editors select qualified reviewers, monitor review timelines, and ensure feedback is constructive. Consistent communication helps authors revise efficiently and improves publication quality.
When reviews conflict, editors synthesize feedback and request additional input as needed.
Decision Letters
Decision letters should be clear, professional, and actionable. Summarize the main reasons for the decision and highlight priority revisions when applicable.
Transparent decision communication improves author experience and accelerates revision cycles.
Time Commitment and Communication
Editors are expected to respond promptly to invitations and manage manuscripts within agreed timelines. Clear communication with reviewers and the editorial office keeps decisions on schedule.
Ethics and Confidentiality
Editors must avoid conflicts of interest, protect reviewer confidentiality, and uphold ethical publishing standards. If concerns arise, the editorial office provides guidance and escalation pathways.
Handling Appeals
When authors appeal a decision, editors should review the rationale objectively and consult the editorial office for guidance. Appeals are evaluated based on evidence and scope fit.
Editorial Support
Editors have access to templates, checklists, and direct support from the JPGR editorial office. These resources help maintain consistent decisions and protect review quality.
Editor Guidelines FAQ
How quickly should I respond to invitations?
Respond promptly so manuscripts can move through review on schedule.
Can I recommend reviewers?
Yes. Suggest qualified reviewers while avoiding conflicts of interest.
What if I need policy guidance?
Contact the editorial office for support on ethics or scope decisions.
Can I decline an assignment?
Yes. Decline promptly if the manuscript is outside your expertise.
JPGR Commitment
JPGR is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in proteomics and genomics. We emphasize reproducible methods, complete data statements, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in molecular publishing.
