Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance to help reviewers evaluate molecular research with confidence.
Resource Highlights
- Checklists and reporting standards
- Ethics and data sharing guidance
- Clear review expectations
- Editorial office support
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2326-0793
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2326-0793
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Proteome profiling, genomic discovery, multi-omics integration, biomarker validation, computational proteomics, and translational molecular medicine. We emphasize reproducible pipelines and clinically meaningful evidence.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid online publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
Resources for Reviewers
JPGR provides guidance to help reviewers deliver consistent, high quality feedback. Resources focus on methodology evaluation, data quality assessment, and ethical considerations.
Available Materials
- Review checklists for proteomics and genomics
- Reporting standard references for study design
- Ethics and conflict of interest guidance
- Data sharing expectations and repository links
Data Evaluation Tips
Reviewers are encouraged to examine data completeness, repository access, and reproducibility statements. Clear documentation of methods and data sources helps validate findings.
Using Review Resources
Use the checklists as a starting point for structured feedback and refer to reporting standards when assessing study design. This helps ensure consistent expectations across submissions.
Quality Indicators Checklist
- Clear hypothesis and defined outcomes
- Transparent methods and reproducible analysis
- Complete data availability statement
- Appropriate statistical reporting and validation
- Clear linkage between results and conclusions
Applying the Checklist
Use the checklist as a guide for structuring your review and highlighting the most important issues first. Consistent use of these indicators improves review clarity for authors and editors.
It also helps reviewers focus on data integrity and methodological quality.
Structured feedback reduces revision cycles and supports quicker decisions.
Clear checklist use benefits both authors and editorial teams.
It also helps reviewers stay consistent.
Consistent reviews reduce confusion for authors.
Consistency improves editorial efficiency overall.
Editorial Support
If you need clarification on scope or review expectations, contact the editorial office. We provide prompt guidance to support efficient and fair reviews.
Reviewer Resources FAQ
Can I request additional guidance on a manuscript?
Yes. Contact the editorial office for clarification or additional resources.
Where can I find reporting standards?
JPGR provides links to CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and related standards.
What should I do if data access is missing?
Note the issue in your review and request the authors clarify data availability.
Do you provide sample reviews?
Guidance examples can be shared on request to help new reviewers.
JPGR Commitment
JPGR is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in proteomics and genomics. We emphasize reproducible methods, complete data statements, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in molecular publishing.
