Submit Manuscript

A clear submission pathway for otolaryngology research and therapy manuscripts.

JOA provides a structured submission process designed for ENT research. Submissions are evaluated for scope fit, methodological rigor, and clinical relevance.

Complete submissions reduce delays and improve review efficiency. Review the scope and reporting requirements before submission.

• Confirm scope fit for otolaryngology
• Prepare ethics approvals and consent statements
• Organize figures, tables, and supplementary files
• Include data availability statements and registry identifiers
• Review reporting standards for your study design

• Original research articles
• Systematic reviews and meta analyses
• Clinical reports and case series
• Methods and technology reports
• Short communications and brief reports

• Title page with author affiliations and corresponding author contact
• Structured abstract with objectives, methods, results, and conclusions
• Methods with detailed study design and analysis
• Results with clear tables, figures, and outcome reporting
• Discussion highlighting clinical relevance and limitations
• Ethics approval, funding, and conflict of interest statements

Provide a contribution statement outlining each author role and confirm that all authors approve the submission. Changes to authorship after submission require written approval from all authors and editorial review.

• Confirm corresponding author contact details
• Describe author contributions clearly
• Disclose any professional or financial conflicts

Include a cover letter summarizing the novelty of the study, its clinical relevance, and why it fits the JOA scope. Mention prior dissemination such as preprints or conference presentations.

Disclose funding sources, grant numbers, and any conflicts of interest. Transparent disclosures help reviewers assess potential bias and strengthen trust in the evidence.

Figures and tables should be cited in the text and include descriptive legends. Supplementary files can include extended methods, datasets, or videos of surgical techniques.

Ensure patient images are de identified and consent is documented when required.

Clear writing improves review efficiency and helps clinicians interpret outcomes accurately. Authors who need language support should contact the editorial office before submission to discuss options and timing.

Provide IRB approvals and informed consent statements for clinical studies. Report adverse events and safety monitoring when applicable.

Transparency in ethics and safety reporting strengthens reviewer confidence and clinical trust.

All submissions are screened for plagiarism and data integrity. Any concerns about image manipulation, duplicate publication, or undisclosed conflicts may result in rejection or further investigation.

Include a data availability statement with repository links or access details. Provide DOIs or accession numbers when possible.

If data are restricted, explain the access pathway for qualified researchers.

Sharing analytical code and workflows improves reproducibility and supports secondary analysis. When possible, provide scripts, software versions, and parameter settings.

If code cannot be shared, describe the analysis pipeline clearly so reviewers can assess reproducibility.

• Provide repository links for code or scripts
• Document software versions and parameters
• Describe data preprocessing steps
• Include accession numbers or DOIs

Accurate metadata improves discoverability and institutional reporting. Include ORCID identifiers for all authors and verify affiliations during proof review.

Clear metadata reduces post publication corrections and strengthens indexing quality.

• Provide ORCID identifiers when available
• Verify author names and affiliations
• Confirm funding and conflict disclosures

• CONSORT for randomized trials
• STROBE for observational studies
• PRISMA for systematic reviews
• CARE for case reports

Submit via ManuscriptZone for full tracking and editorial coordination. A quick submission option is available through the Simple Manuscript Submission Form for initial details.

• ManuscriptZone: https://oap.manuscriptzone.net
• Simple Manuscript Submission Form: https://openaccesspub.org/manuscript-submission-form

JOA uses single blind peer review. Reviewers evaluate scientific rigor, data quality, and clinical relevance. Editors provide consolidated decision letters with clear guidance.

Initial decisions are typically issued within 2 to 4 weeks, depending on reviewer availability.

Accepted manuscripts move to production for copyediting, proof review, and DOI registration. The standard APC is $1,800 USD and applies after acceptance.

Articles are published under CC BY 4.0 to support open access reuse with attribution.

If reviewer feedback requires clarification, contact the editorial office for guidance. Clear, timely communication helps keep review cycles on track.

Notify the editorial office promptly if you anticipate delays in revision or proof review.

Proof review is the final opportunity to confirm accuracy of figures, tables, and metadata. Respond promptly to avoid publication delays.

• Check spelling of author names and affiliations
• Verify figure labels and captions
• Confirm data values and units
• Review references and DOI links

Authors may request clarification on editorial decisions or submit appeals with a clear rationale. The editorial office reviews appeals to ensure fair and consistent handling.

• Scope alignment confirmed
• Ethics approvals and consent documented
• Data availability statement included
• Figures and tables labeled and cited
• Cover letter prepared with scope fit summary

The editorial office can provide guidance on scope, formatting, and submission steps. For questions about submission options, contact [email protected].

The editorial office supports authors with scope checks, formatting guidance, and policy clarifications before and after submission. Early communication prevents delays and ensures manuscripts meet ENT expectations, including data statements, ethics approvals, and reporting standards.

Authors receive clear decision letters and may request clarification on reviewer feedback or revision priorities. The team can also advise on file preparation, figure requirements, and how to present clinical outcomes for readability.

For workflow questions or guidance on special issues, contact [email protected] and include the manuscript title and journal name.

• Scope check support before submission
• Guidance on reporting standards
• Help with data availability statements
• Clarification on revision expectations
• Support during proof review

JOA emphasizes transparent methods and reproducible reporting. Manuscripts should clearly describe study design, cohort selection, intervention protocols, and outcome definitions so reviewers can assess clinical relevance and rigor.

We encourage authors to document analytic decisions, device specifications, and follow up intervals. Clear reporting strengthens evidence quality and helps clinicians apply findings in practice.

Using structured reporting standards improves peer review efficiency and supports long term reuse of ENT evidence.

• Use CONSORT, STROBE, or PRISMA
• Report adverse events and limitations
• Define primary and secondary outcomes
• Document follow up duration
• Provide transparent data statements

Submissions move through initial screening, peer review, revision, and production. Each stage includes quality checks to ensure ethical compliance and accurate reporting.

JOA aims to deliver decisions within the 2 to 4 week review window, depending on reviewer availability and manuscript complexity. Prompt author responses help keep timelines on track.

After acceptance, articles proceed to copyediting, proof review, and DOI registration before publication.

• Initial screening for scope and ethics
• Single blind peer review by experts
• Revision cycle based on reviewer input
• Production with copyediting and proofs
• Publication after final approval

Open access publishing increases the reach of otolaryngology research across clinical, academic, and allied health communities. Articles are immediately accessible to clinicians, trainees, and policy teams who rely on current evidence.

JOA supports DOI registration, metadata quality checks, and indexing readiness to improve discoverability and citation tracking. Clear titles and structured abstracts strengthen search visibility.

Authors can increase impact by sharing DOI links, depositing datasets, and communicating findings through professional networks.

• DOI registration for permanent access
• Metadata validation for indexing
• Open access for global readership
• Support for institutional reporting
• Guidance on sharing published work

Use standard file formats and ensure that all figures are high resolution and clearly labeled. Tables should be editable and formatted for readability.

Define abbreviations at first use and use consistent units throughout the manuscript. Include device specifications, software versions, and analytic parameters as needed.

Clear technical formatting reduces revision cycles and improves production efficiency.

• Submit editable tables and captions
• Use consistent units and abbreviations
• Provide high resolution figures
• Label all files clearly
• Confirm figure permissions

Many funders and institutions require open access publication, licensing statements, and documented APC payments. JOA provides invoices, payment confirmations, and licensing details to support compliance.

Authors should include grant numbers and funding acknowledgments during submission to ensure accurate metadata. Clear funding records improve institutional reporting and reduce administrative delays.

For documentation requests or billing questions, contact [email protected] and include the manuscript title.

• Confirm funding sources before acceptance
• Include grant numbers in metadata
• Request invoices for reimbursement
• Retain acceptance documentation
• Coordinate with institutional billing

Preprints are allowed when disclosed in the cover letter and cited appropriately. Prior conference presentations should also be noted to maintain transparency.

Authors must confirm that the submitted manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere and that any overlap with prior work is clearly explained.

• Disclose preprints in the cover letter
• Cite preprints in the references
• Explain overlap with related publications

After publication, authors should share the DOI link through professional networks, institutional repositories, and conference presentations. This improves reach among ENT clinicians and researchers.

Corrections, updates, or data clarifications can be coordinated with the editorial office to maintain an accurate scholarly record. JOA supports transparent updates when needed.

For questions about post publication visibility or corrections, contact [email protected].

• Share DOI links with collaborators
• Deposit accepted versions when allowed
• Monitor citations and engagement
• Request corrections promptly if needed
• Coordinate outreach with the journal